IAA Newsletters

IAASysters NZ 2026 took place in March in Christchurch. It was another inspiring and intense three days.

Our 2026 cohort did not disappoint. The collaboration and engagement throughout the Workshop was something to behold. Then it was on to the full NZNOG conference, for more learning and networking. By the final day, lifelong connections had been forged. We’re excited to stay in touch and follow our latest cohort though their successful careers in tech.

Plans are already underway for next year’s event, so if you have colleagues in New Zealand who may benefit from the program, be sure to let them know!

A huge thank you to our speakers Cheryl Alderman, Aleisha Amohia, Alexia Hilbertidou, and Sally Foley-Lewis.

Thanks also to our sponsors whose support makes this program possible.

IAA Brisbane is next. See above for details.

Read More

The Summit returns for its 25th edition on 2–3 June at the Fullerton Hotel, Martin Place, Sydney with a pre-summit forum on 1 June.

IAA CEO, Narelle Clark, will be on stage at the pre-summit “Restoring Telecom Reputation” forum, joining Australia’s senior telco leaders to examine how the sector can strengthen public confidence amid heightened regulatory, political, and consumer scrutiny.

IAA is also a Lightning Talk Sponsor at this year’s Summit, with Narelle taking the stage once again on day two, as part of the sponsored session.

Don’t miss it.

Read More

The IAA Team joined them in a Casino Royale evening on the 38th floor of the voco Auckland City Centre, for black tie, casino tables, and champagne. Ten years of member-based peering, and not a bad way to mark it.
Congratulations NZIX and here’s to the next ten!

Read More

The NZNOG community descended on Christchurch in March for what turned out to be their biggest conference yet, with a record 260 attendees.

IAASysters NZ 2026 preceded the main conference, with our cohort diving straight into the Workshop before joining the broader event. The IAA Team represented with our Technical Lead delivering our annual NZIX update.

Program Manager, Tanzia Hewer, assisted the NZIX team with their booth. This year NZIX were back with the hoodies, and enough giveaways to keep the conference floor talking.

The conference dinner at the Air Force Museum of New Zealand was a highlight. Aircraft overhead, three courses, and the kind of company that makes NZNOG one of the industry’s most valued gatherings.

NZNOG 2026 was an outstanding success by every measure.

See you in 2027!

Read More

It’s been another busy period for the team with lots of regulatory news for the industry. We’re working hard to represent Members and shape policy that will affect the telecommunications sector in a way that is practical and measured.

TCP Code Rejected
The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) rejected the Telecommunications Consumer Protections Code (TCP Code) in March. Following an extensive review process that has been ongoing since 2023, the industry code will be replaced by an industry standard to be developed by the ACMA.

The TCP Code is a significant co-regulatory instrument that sets out key consumer safeguards in the telco context covering sales, billing, credit management, and more. Members can expect the ACMA to consult on regulation that will replace the TCP Code in the coming months. Until the replacement Standard comes into place, compliance with the TCP Code remains mandatory.

IAA was deeply disappointed to hear of the ACMA’s decision. Having been actively and consistently involved in the recent review process, we considered the uplifts committed to by industry, in the final version submitted to the ACMA, represented substantial improvements, while still preserving the benefits of a co-regulatory model.

The ACMA’s decision comes off the back of recent years where the co-regulatory model has faced increasing scrutiny. We maintain there has been a great deal of misunderstanding of what co-regulation is. Co-regulation does not mean voluntary. Rather, industry-developed codes such as the TCP Code ensure that regulatory obligations remain technically and operationally workable, reflecting the realities of complex networks and systems. It is therefore concerning that one of the sector’s most important co-regulatory instruments may be replaced by regulation that does not sufficiently take into account these operational realities.

Disappointed we may be, but defeated we are not. We will continue to advocate on behalf of our Members regarding the development of the replacement Standard. We are particularly focused on making sure the voices of smaller ISPs are heard so that the new Standard is measured, practical and fit for purpose.

You can read our media release in response to the ACMA’s decision on our website.

Telco Domestic Family and Sexual Violence Standard
Obligations for smaller telecommunications service providers are now live. From 1 April 2026, most of the remaining obligations under the Telecommunications (Domestic, Family and Sexual Violence Consumer Protections) Industry Standard 2025 (DFSV Standard) commenced.

The DFSV Standard applies to all CSPs that supply telecommunications services to consumers including residential, business, and NFP organisation customers.

IAA has partnered with the WISPAU to deliver template compliance materials and practical training to assist Members with their compliance. You can read more in this article.

PPAP Meeting
On 11 March, we held our inaugural in-person Public Policy Advisory Panel (PPAP) meeting! Sitting down in one room, face-to-face, the PPAP had a very productive session getting deep into the regulatory landscape of telecommunications.

PPAP members shared their concerns about the impact of the DFSV Standard compliance obligations on telco staff. As telco staff are expected to handle highly distressing and sensitive matters, even with the training and staff support provisions built into the DFSV Standard, there remains concern that staff wellbeing is a key gap in the regulation, as they are being expected to respond to domestic and family violence as though they were specialists in the field.

Another core issue that keeps coming back was on ‘internet as an essential service’. Telecommunications and the internet arw increasingly being called ‘essential’ but there remain regulatory gaps as ‘essential services’ has a specific legislative meaning and is governed by State/Territory law. If the internet is truly expected to function as an ‘essential service’, it’s time for government, industry, and consumers to seriously discuss what this actually entails.

Completed submissions:

Open consultations:

Read More